arizona_ref_2001.jpgCalifornia Attorney General Kamala Harris is praising today’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down several parts of a controversial Arizona immigration law enacted in 2010.

Harris said the ruling “strikes down some of the most egregious components of Arizona’s misguided law.

“I believe today’s decision is an important step forward in setting aside policies that divide law enforcement from the communities we serve,” she said.

The state of Arizona appealed to the high court after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco last year upheld a preliminary injunction by a federal judge in Phoenix that blocked four provisions of the law.

In today’s decision, the high court overturned three of those provisions, saying that they are preempted by federal immigration law.

The court left in place for the time being a fourth provision that requires state and local police to determine the immigration status of people they arrest.

But the panel said that provision could be applied only in cases of valid arrests, and also left the door open for it to be challenged later.

The other three provisions struck down by the court were sections that allowed warrantless arrests of people believed to have committed deportable offenses; made it a state crime to be in the country illegally; and made it a state crime for undocumented immigrants to seek or hold jobs.

Julia Mass, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union’s San Francisco office, said California is among the states that have already rejected Arizona’s approach.

“Californians already understand the importance of allowing police to focus on public safety instead of local immigration enforcement,” Mass said.

Emphasizing the provision that was not struck down, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer issued a statement calling the ruling “a victory for the rule of law” and saying that “the heart of the law” can now be implemented.

President Obama said in a statement, “I am pleased that the Supreme Court has struck down key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law.”

However, the president said he is concerned about the impact of the provision left in place.

“What this decision makes unmistakably clear is that Congress must act on comprehensive immigration reform,” Obama said.

“A patchwork of state laws is not a solution to our broken immigration system–it’s part of the problem,” he said.

Julia Cheever, Bay City News

Want more news, sent to your inbox every day? Then how about subscribing to our email newsletter? Here’s why we think you should. Come on, give it a try.

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • Soonerdiver

    “The other three provisions struck down by the court were sections that allowed warrantless arrests of people believed to have committed deportable offenses; made it a state crime to be in the country illegally; and made it a state crime for undocumented immigrants to seek or hold jobs.”… regrettably the current Obama Administration is not enforcing it’s own Federal Laws. A prime example is the latest edict from on high to allow illegals who commit crimes to remain in the U.S. if they were brought here as children.

    Also, the POTUS wants his DREAM Act to pass congress, good luck with that, so that illegals can join the military and get citizenship… unfortunately you can NOT join the military as an illegal immigrant.

    San Francisco is a prime example of ‘allowing the police protect it’s citizens’ and not police illegals. The current and past city governments have allowed convicted felons and illegals to remain in the Bay Area to continue their life of crime.

    You might want to re-evaluate your current position and start sending some of those illegals back to where they originated from.

  • Soonerdiver

    “The other three provisions struck down by the court were sections that allowed warrantless arrests of people believed to have committed deportable offenses; made it a state crime to be in the country illegally; and made it a state crime for undocumented immigrants to seek or hold jobs.”… regrettably the current Obama Administration is not enforcing it’s own Federal Laws. A prime example is the latest edict from on high to allow illegals who commit crimes to remain in the U.S. if they were brought here as children.

    Also, the POTUS wants his DREAM Act to pass congress, good luck with that, so that illegals can join the military and get citizenship… unfortunately you can NOT join the military as an illegal immigrant.

    San Francisco is a prime example of ‘allowing the police protect it’s citizens’ and not police illegals. The current and past city governments have allowed convicted felons and illegals to remain in the Bay Area to continue their life of crime.

    You might want to re-evaluate your current position and start sending some of those illegals back to where they originated from.