cityhall3.jpgSan Francisco Supervisor Mark Farrell introduced campaign finance legislation Tuesday that could affect the city’s mayoral race in November.

Farrell is seeking to amend a San Francisco law that governs public financing of candidates running for office in the city after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a similar law in Arizona last month.

Under San Francisco’s existing law, passed by voters as Proposition O in 2000, mayoral candidates are each eligible to receive $900,000 in public matching funds, while supervisorial candidates can receive $89,000.

The city’s Ethics Commission is allowed to increase those figures for candidates if there is a certain level of private money being spent against a candidate by opponents.

The new legislation would eliminate the additional public matching funds, the provision that was struck down in Arizona’s case.

There are more than 30 candidates running for mayor, and many of the leading candidates are receiving public financing.

Farrell said the city can either change its law “or wait for a plaintiff to sue … and I don’t want to waste additional taxpayer funds” in a legal battle.

To make a change to the law, the Ethics Commission has to approve the change by a four-fifths vote, which it did on Monday.

The Board of Supervisors will have to approve the change by a two-thirds vote.

Dan McMenamin, Bay City News

Want more news, sent to your inbox every day? Then how about subscribing to our email newsletter? Here’s why we think you should. Come on, give it a try.

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • Mo Chin

    So thirty candidates does that translate into 20-30 MILLION DOLLARS…WTF
    How about no money…

  • Mo Chin

    So thirty candidates does that translate into 20-30 MILLION DOLLARS…WTF
    How about no money…