SF Animal Commission, Supes Might Make It Harder For Landlords To Say "No Pets"
The San Francisco Animal Control and Welfare Commission is expected to encourage the SF Board of Supervisors to push SF landlords to become much more...
These are the comments for SF Animal Commission, Supes Might Make It Harder For Landlords To Say "No Pets"
(4)
- Nat Ford Defies Gavin: Sunday, Extended Weekday Parking Meters Back On Table
- Drivers Watch Out: Bus Only Lane Stings Reported
- Want To Run Muni? Email Gavin
- Muni Metro Back On Track, Even As Overall Performance Continues To Drop
- Tenant Troubles: Roach Recourse?
- What Will It Take To Save Mid-Market?
- Newsom Proposal to Ban Texting, Tweeting Questioned (Via Facebook)
- Reports: Kid Hospitalized After Falling From Moving 38 Geary
- The Richmond Report: Grow Houses And Anarchy
- SF Nets $10 Mil in Investment Opportunity Won in Energy Crisis Lawsuit Settlement (Mostly Already Spent)
- See Spot: Investigating Pt. Reyes' Missing Women
- Battered But Unbowed: Tadich Grill Damage Estimated At $150K, But Plans To Reopen Tuesday
- Photos, Video: Three-Alarm Blaze Behind Beach Blanket Babylon
- Class Action Suit Filed Against CitiApartments For Failure To Return Deposits
- Video: Chinatown Residents Fight Off Eviction
- One Way To Get Your CitiApartments Deposit Back
- Outlook Not Good For CitiApartments Tenants Complaining Of Illegally Withheld Deposits
- Does A Private Company Own Your Muni Arrival Times?
- $6.2 Mi For 311 Too Pricey For MTA, They Pimp 511
- $147 Million Deal Could Derail Central Subway Project Budget
wiggles said:
November 12, 2009 8:38 PM
Reply
uh, like presa canarios?
cedichou said:
November 13, 2009 10:32 AM
Reply
How about water beds? They are unduly discriminated against. Tragically, they end up in land fill too many times because landlords won't accept them either.
Celbridge said:
November 14, 2009 6:06 PM
Reply
State law already requires landlords to allow waterbeds in buildings that received a certificate of occupancy after January 1, 1973 (California civil code section 1940.5).
Requiring landlords to allow pets is not unprecedented. Ontario Canada's Residential Tenancies Act voids any clause in a lease that prohibits pets. Link
Fred said:
November 16, 2009 11:00 PM
Reply
What about the right of neighboring tenants not to be exposed to the constant noise from little yipping dogs? I am thrilled that my building is no-pets, which enabled the management company to evict the clandestine yippers that moved in next to me.