Displaced Tenants Call For Change At City Hall Hearing On Ellis Act Evictions

Tenants being evicted or displaced from rental units in San Francisco came to City Hall today to tell their stories at a committee hearing of the Board of Supervisors.

The hearing at the board’s neighborhood services and safety committee was requested by Supervisor David Campos, who said he wanted to “put a human face to the evictions that are happening.”

Campos also requested a report by the city’s budget and legislative analyst on how frequently evictions occur in San Francisco.

The report found that evictions are up sharply in the past few years, particularly those done via the Ellis Act, a state law that allows landlords to remove residents if the property is being taken off the rental market.

There have been 116 Ellis Act evictions of units in the city in 2013, up from 43 in 2010, according to the report, which found that the evictions were concentrated in neighborhoods like the Mission and Castro districts.

That number does not include the many tenants who are displaced after agreeing to vacate the units in exchange for financial settlements with their landlords.

The report found that San Francisco’s population went up by 20,400 residents between 2010 and 2012, but only 122 new units were built during that time.

Campos called the evictions “a crisis that goes to the very question of who we are as a city.”

“We’re fighting, I think, for the soul of San Francisco,” he said, adding that he is proposing legislation that would double the amount of relocation assistance required to be paid to tenants evicted via the Ellis Act, among other new tenant protections.

Beverly Upton is among the many San Francisco residents who is considering whether to accept a settlement or possibly face eviction via the Ellis Act.

Upton, executive director of the San Francisco Domestic Violence Consortium, talks to the supervisors and other city staff regularly about public safety issues and has lived in a flat near Gough and Oak streets for more than 20 years.

She said, “Once the advocates and organizers are gone, who will be left to look after the city?”

Housing advocates held a rally outside of City Hall before today’s hearing and called for a moratorium on evictions and displacements.

“Can we pause all of the evictions to come up with a better solution for housing?” said John Eller of the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment.

Tom Rapp, a Mission District resident, is also facing an Ellis Act eviction along with his elderly roommate.

“I’m tired of seeing the city I love turn … into a place for only millionaires and billionaires to love,” Rapp said.

Mayor Ed Lee announced today that he was joining Campos and other city and state legislators to advocate for changes in state law to allow cities and counties more flexibility to regulate Ellis Act evictions.

“While we have some of the best tenant protections in the country, there are a small number of speculators out there who are turning a quick profit at the expense of long time tenants,” Lee said. “A carve out for San Francisco is good policy and will help us support middle income and working families here in San Francisco.”

He said, “At the same time, we must continue to build the thousands of new homes we need for our growing workforce, including new permanently affordable homes for our working families.”

Dan McMenamin, Bay City News

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • Justkiddinng

    I want to quit the rental business. I’m fed up dealing with tenants. I’m
    too old to be getting jerked around by lifetime low paying tenants. I
    want to cash out and retire with my wife after being a rent controlled
    landlord for the last 45 years.

    My only choice Ellis my building and quit the business and sell my property. And you jerks want to stop me.

    • LVLHeaded

      How dare you try and use your property like you so choose!

    • theHitman

      Do it! Ellis them all I say! If all of us landlords band together we can break the system once and for all. In any case, sooner or later a scum-sucking tenant leach or carcass picking Crow will try to shake you down. It is better to beat them to the punch.

  • LVLHeaded

    The sad fact is that no one has the RIGHT to rent a certain apartment indefinitely. Cities grow and change as they should. That’s the benefit of home ownership vs renting. With ownership you get the security of not being forced out. With renting, however, you don’t have to put money into maintaining the property that you do with home ownership. To truly tackle things like the middle class being forced out we need to focus on the LACK of housing and not the EFFECTS of the lack of housing (ie evictions). You have to fix the problem, not treat the side effects.

  • Tom Thomas

    Being a landlord is not alway profitable and hardly enjoyable. The city has to make it more profitable to be in the landlord business and this is the only way to preserve rental units. If your investment income does not keep pace with inflation nor does it keep pace with the requirements the city has made with retrofits on soft stories or other requirements made by the city. So your only option is Elis or offer a buy out. Any additional laws or increase cost is only going to make it worse for renters. Landlords are going to take more unit off the market and just not rent them or put them off and ABNB them. Why deal with a long term tenant when you can make more on Air BnB? If anything changes the Ellis, you will see more Ellis evictions because guess what, its cheaper to do it now than later. So who looses, the renters again. Remember for each newly available rental on the market today is supporting many others who are paying way below market rate.