Realtors, Cops, Conway, Coates Fund Lee; Unions, Especially Nurses, Bankroll Mar

lee.newsom.jpg

Gavin Newsom wasn’t a frequent visitor to San Francisco’s west side during his (almost) two terms as mayor. But the California lieutenant governor was drawn to the Richmond on Saturday. Newsom was the main attraction this weekend at campaign rallies for David Lee, the insurance salesman and university lecturer who seeks to unseat Eric Mar as District 1 supervisor.

Lee’s help from Newsom — the current mayor, Ed Lee (no relation) has not endorsed or campaigned in the Richmond — is notable as the lieutenant governor’s first foray back into local politics since moving onto Sacramento. Lee has also drawn a record-breaking amount of soft money in his quest to unseat Mar, who has proven unpopular with police, property developers, and other moneyed interests.

As of Friday — with spending over the weekend and up til polls close Tuesday still unaccounted for — there was $714,745 in third-party spending in District 1, according to records. This is the most third-party spending in any San Francisco district election.

Of this, $550,806 was spent on supporting Lee or opposing Mar, and $163,939 was spent on supporting Mar or opposing Lee, according to records.

This eclipses the previous record by a wide margin. The previous record, $540,489 in independent spending, was set when three candidates, including Mar, vied for District 1 in 2008. The next-highest amount is $524,525, set in District 8 in 2010, which was also a three-candidate race.

The candidates may yet set records for “official” spending as well. As of Nov. 1, Lee reported $303,297 in spending, and Mar had raised $271,754.

Independent expenditure committees, or IEs, are not subject to the same contribution limits as candidates’ campaign committees. By law, they are prohibited from participating with “official” election activities.

“There has never been anything like this in the history of district elections,” Mar campaign spokeswoman Nicole Derse told the Appeal.

Representatives for Lee, including campaign manager Jim Ross, did not return messages seeking comment.

It’s simple to break down who’s spending for who. Lee’s backers include a who’s who of the city’s power elite, while Mar counts on financial support from unions.

The spending for Lee comes from three major sources: the Coalition for Sensible Government, the Coalition for Jobs and Sustainable Growth, and the Coalition for a Safer California.

The first two are familiar players in San Francisco politics. The San Francisco Association of Realtors funds the first coalition, which has spent $225,000 as of Friday.

Real estate developer Thomas Coates ($50,000), the Golden Gate Restuarant Association ($40,000), and the Building Owners and Managers Association ($35,000) bankrolled the Coalition for Jobs.

The last, a relatively new player to San Francisco politicswas floated by a $60,000 contribution from the San Francisco Police Officers Association — who have loathed Mar ever since the supervisor sponsored nonbinding legislation regarding the “San Francisco 8,” radicals associated with the 1971 murder of San Francisco police Sgt. John Young — and $20,000 from tech magnate Ron Conway.

Soft money for Mar comes from unions. The California Nurses Association has spent $42,802 on the supervisor, and a committee controlled by the San Francisco Labor Council spent another $98,000.

It’s possible that soft-money spending could break $1 million once the final results are tallied: Lee’s soft-money support spent $40,000 a day since Oct. 30, except for Nov. 1, when $70,000 was spent.

Photo of Lee and Newsom: David Lee for Supervisor 2012′s Facebook page

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • Fred Dobbs

    This election has very little to do with money. Mar has actually spent taxpayer dollars to send a flier to everyone’s home trying to imply he helps people in the neighborhood who want a neighborhood school get it, but it’s a lie. A woman, Camile She, claimed that it was thanks to his leadership she could send her kids to school in the neighborhood. People get that and are like, what? It’s an obvious, intentional lie.

    60% of the Richmond was for neighborhood schools. We don’t want our children on buses and being driven far, exhausting parents and kids and breaking up our community. Mar showed a lack of integrity in sending out that flier. We know better. The money has little to do with it. Mar might have won District 5 or another, but not the Richmond. His school policy hurt thousands of Richmond District residents and motivated many volunteers. The money is secondary to the neighborhood schools/integrity issue.

  • Fred Dobbs

    This election has very little to do with money. Mar has actually spent taxpayer dollars to send a flier to everyone’s home trying to imply he helps people in the neighborhood who want a neighborhood school get it, but it’s a lie. A woman, Camile She, claimed that it was thanks to his leadership she could send her kids to school in the neighborhood. People get that and are like, what? It’s an obvious, intentional lie.

    60% of the Richmond was for neighborhood schools. We don’t want our children on buses and being driven far, exhausting parents and kids and breaking up our community. Mar showed a lack of integrity in sending out that flier. We know better. The money has little to do with it. Mar might have won District 5 or another, but not the Richmond. His school policy hurt thousands of Richmond District residents and motivated many volunteers. The money is secondary to the neighborhood schools/integrity issue.

  • Fred Dobbs

    This election has very little to do with money. Mar has actually spent taxpayer dollars to send a flier to everyone’s home trying to imply he helps people in the neighborhood who want a neighborhood school get it, but it’s a lie. A woman, Camile She, claimed that it was thanks to his leadership she could send her kids to school in the neighborhood. People get that and are like, what? It’s an obvious, intentional lie.

    60% of the Richmond was for neighborhood schools. We don’t want our children on buses and being driven far, exhausting parents and kids and breaking up our community. Mar showed a lack of integrity in sending out that flier. We know better. The money has little to do with it. Mar might have won District 5 or another, but not the Richmond. His school policy hurt thousands of Richmond District residents and motivated many volunteers. The money is secondary to the neighborhood schools/integrity issue.

  • Fred Dobbs

    This election has very little to do with money. Mar has actually spent taxpayer dollars to send a flier to everyone’s home trying to imply he helps people in the neighborhood who want a neighborhood school get it, but it’s a lie. A woman, Camile She, claimed that it was thanks to his leadership she could send her kids to school in the neighborhood. People get that and are like, what? It’s an obvious, intentional lie.

    60% of the Richmond was for neighborhood schools. We don’t want our children on buses and being driven far, exhausting parents and kids and breaking up our community. Mar showed a lack of integrity in sending out that flier. We know better. The money has little to do with it. Mar might have won District 5 or another, but not the Richmond. His school policy hurt thousands of Richmond District residents and motivated many volunteers. The money is secondary to the neighborhood schools/integrity issue.