BarcenasOliver09.24.12.jpgWhat began as a meeting about an officer-involved shooting in San Francisco’s Mission District last Thursday turned into a heated discussion about the police response to the destructive protests that occurred after the shooting.

“The fact that an officer-involved shooting took place does not provide an excuse for anyone to vandalize the community,” San Francisco District 9 Supervisor David Campos said. “That’s the message we want to send here.”

In response to the officer-involved shooting on Thursday, protesters took to the streets Thursday and Friday nights, smashing windows and spray painting buildings. During the Thursday protest, someone spray-painted the word “killers” on the Mission District police station.

At a town hall meeting held at the Cornerstone Church on 17th Street that was attended by a handful of residents and business owners, what riled up participants was what they called inaction by police while the protesters threw bottles and defaced property.

“I saw the police response,” said Milton O’Brien, who owns the Live Fit Wellness Club on Valencia Street. “There was no response at all. I saw no bottles being taken away.

Matter of fact, the same person who went and attacked the windows on Valencia Street and attacked a police car and attacked Mission station was the same exact person that attacked my business on Friday night.”

Elliot Byrnes, 42, who has lived in the Mission District for 10 years, was at 16th and Mission streets when some of the vandals ran past him and began smashing nearby windows.

“I started screaming, ‘What are you doing in my neighborhood, what are you doing now?'” Byrnes said.

He said he believes it makes things worse when police respond passively.

“The word gets out the cops are just standing there … You’ll get more destruction. They’ll get more of these cowards to come in,” Byrnes said.

O’Brien was power-washing the paint and graffiti off his fitness club on Friday night when officers walked by. He said he asked them, “‘Why did you not do anything?'”

“(The officer) basically said to me, “‘We were scared and we didn’t know what to do,'” O’Brien said.

Police Chief Greg Suhr said officers did get involved, confiscating hammers and bottles from protesters, but responded strategically in order not to rile up the crowd further.

“It’s very difficult with these masked guys and girls, to some extent, to grab one out of the crowd without furthering and exacerbating the event,” Suhr said.

Jim Salinas, who grew up in the Mission District, also attended the meeting.

“We need to have our families walk the streets of San Francisco and know that they are safe because there are way too many felons and criminals,” Salinas said. “We don’t want San Francisco to become another Oakland.”

At the meeting, Suhr identified the suspect as Oliver Barcenas, 22, of Richmond, who he said is a known Norteno gang member.

Police said the shooting happened after two plainclothes officers from the department’s gang task force working with two probation officers saw two people they thought they recognized as gang members.

One of the officers attempted to talk to one of the two people, but that person ran away and the officer gave chase, police said.

Suhr said today that during the pursuit, Barcenas reached into his waistband and took out a TEC-9 gun.

The officer ordered him to drop the weapon, but Barcenas did not do so, police said. When Barcenas turned toward the officer with the gun in hand, the officer opened fire, police said.

The officer fired three shots, striking Barcenas twice, Suhr said.

The TEC-9 was loaded with 25 rounds of 9mm ammunition, police said.

Barcenas had recently been paroled for a gang-related shooting in San Francisco in which two people were shot, including a 15-year-old boy, Suhr said.

Suhr said Barcenas is a potential third-strike candidate under California’s “three strikes” law.

According to Lt. Hector Saenz, it was believed Barcenas was bound for the southern end of the Mission District to exact revenge for a murder that had occurred a week earlier.

Thomas Mazzucco, president of the San Francisco Police Commission, pointed out the deadly nature of the TEC-9 gun police said Barcenas was carrying.

“Make no mistake about it; that is a murder weapon” Mazzucco said. “That weapon was designed to kill more than one person … What we should be talking about is the heroism of the officer that took on that individual.”

Want more news, sent to your inbox every day? Then how about subscribing to our email newsletter? Here’s why we think you should. Come on, give it a try.

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • Soonerdiver

    We should be treating the officer who shot the bad guy and took a TEC-9 off the streets? OK! But what about the dozens of other Mission Precinct Officers who did nothing to control or stop the rioting on the streets? What about the wanton destruction of private and public property that they just sat and watched happen?

    Your wonderful “Chief” says it is difficult to pick one ‘masked’ person from the crowd without make the matters worse… B.S.! Take the whole damn lot… I have to agree that the reputation of the SFPD in dealing with protests and rioting crowds is ‘passive’ to say the very least. This will only do more harm to the streets of San Francisco.

    I am a native San Franciscan, born and raised in the Mission (19th and Hartford) and remember walking home with friends, from playing bball at Everett Jr. High at night. The streets were safe for women and young adults to walk on… now? Not on a good day.

    Good luck getting your problems solved, but don’t hold your breath!

  • Soonerdiver

    We should be treating the officer who shot the bad guy and took a TEC-9 off the streets? OK! But what about the dozens of other Mission Precinct Officers who did nothing to control or stop the rioting on the streets? What about the wanton destruction of private and public property that they just sat and watched happen?

    Your wonderful “Chief” says it is difficult to pick one ‘masked’ person from the crowd without make the matters worse… B.S.! Take the whole damn lot… I have to agree that the reputation of the SFPD in dealing with protests and rioting crowds is ‘passive’ to say the very least. This will only do more harm to the streets of San Francisco.

    I am a native San Franciscan, born and raised in the Mission (19th and Hartford) and remember walking home with friends, from playing bball at Everett Jr. High at night. The streets were safe for women and young adults to walk on… now? Not on a good day.

    Good luck getting your problems solved, but don’t hold your breath!

  • Soonerdiver

    We should be treating the officer who shot the bad guy and took a TEC-9 off the streets? OK! But what about the dozens of other Mission Precinct Officers who did nothing to control or stop the rioting on the streets? What about the wanton destruction of private and public property that they just sat and watched happen?

    Your wonderful “Chief” says it is difficult to pick one ‘masked’ person from the crowd without make the matters worse… B.S.! Take the whole damn lot… I have to agree that the reputation of the SFPD in dealing with protests and rioting crowds is ‘passive’ to say the very least. This will only do more harm to the streets of San Francisco.

    I am a native San Franciscan, born and raised in the Mission (19th and Hartford) and remember walking home with friends, from playing bball at Everett Jr. High at night. The streets were safe for women and young adults to walk on… now? Not on a good day.

    Good luck getting your problems solved, but don’t hold your breath!

  • Soonerdiver

    We should be treating the officer who shot the bad guy and took a TEC-9 off the streets? OK! But what about the dozens of other Mission Precinct Officers who did nothing to control or stop the rioting on the streets? What about the wanton destruction of private and public property that they just sat and watched happen?

    Your wonderful “Chief” says it is difficult to pick one ‘masked’ person from the crowd without make the matters worse… B.S.! Take the whole damn lot… I have to agree that the reputation of the SFPD in dealing with protests and rioting crowds is ‘passive’ to say the very least. This will only do more harm to the streets of San Francisco.

    I am a native San Franciscan, born and raised in the Mission (19th and Hartford) and remember walking home with friends, from playing bball at Everett Jr. High at night. The streets were safe for women and young adults to walk on… now? Not on a good day.

    Good luck getting your problems solved, but don’t hold your breath!