memphis1.jpg

San Francisco police Chief Greg Suhr last week cited a recent policy change in Memphis, Tenn., as a reason for why his department needs Tasers.

However, Suhr had the wrong Memphis.

Police in the 1.1 square mile Memphis, Michigan , rather than the much larger city in Tennessee, were the ones who adopted the use of the stun guns last December, San Francisco police spokesman Sgt. Mike Andraychak said today.

According to Wikipedia, “as of the census of 2010, there were 1,183 people, 457 households, and 296 families” making up the population of Memphis, Michigan.

Memphis, Tennessee, says Wikipedia, “had a population of 662,897 at the 2010 census, making it the largest city in the state of Tennessee, the third largest in the Southeastern United States, and the 20th largest in the United States.”

Suhr had argued at a Police Commission hearing Aug. 1 that San Francisco police should have the less-than-lethal devices, citing Memphis as an example of another department that had avoided using Tasers, but decided to allow the devices last December.

The chief noted that San Francisco last year modeled its crisis intervention team after the one in Memphis, an argument that seemed to sway commission Vice President Joe Marshall.

“We were told, ‘Look at Memphis, look at Memphis.’ Well I’m still looking at Memphis,” Marshall said during the meeting.

However, Andraychak said today that a police commander contacted police in Memphis, Tenn., following the meeting and learned that their department was still without Tasers.

Commissioner Petra DeJesus, who has been critical of the proposal to allow San Francisco police to use Tasers, was surprised to learn of the department’s error today.

“I’m kind of shocked to hear they have the wrong Memphis,” DeJesus said. “It’s an important fact.”

She said, “I don’t think they meant to be misleading but they need to be correct when they present those facts. If it wasn’t true, that’s just not cool.”

The Police Commission on Aug. 1 ultimately decided to put off a decision on whether to start a pilot program with the Tasers for at least 90 days while the department studies all less-than-lethal options and consults with various community groups.

Photo of Memphis, Michigan, sign: InfoMi.com

Eve Batey contributed to this report by Dan McMenamin of Bay City News

Want more news, sent to your inbox every day? Then how about subscribing to our email newsletter? Here’s why we think you should. Come on, give it a try.

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • LibertyHiller

    Way to inspire us with confidence, Chief.

  • LibertyHiller

    Way to inspire us with confidence, Chief.

  • boadicaea

    Another question: Why does a town of 1,183 people need tasers? In the lake area of Michigan?

    There is so much money available, and so many offers are made of cheap and surplus military equipment and weapons, to police departments–mostly from departments in the Pentagon. Add this to the money from Homeland Security for local intelligence (aka spying) and money from the federal government for WarOnDrugs activities (not to mention the drugs themselves). The result is exactly what we have–militarized police departments overloaded with easily obtained military equipment and extra cash (which makes them independent of the communities they supposedly serve).

    I’m very interested in the Memphis, Michigan rationale for having tasers, and what the ratio between the number of tasers they acquired and the number of residents available to be tased.

  • boadicaea

    Another question: Why does a town of 1,183 people need tasers? In the lake area of Michigan?

    There is so much money available, and so many offers are made of cheap and surplus military equipment and weapons, to police departments–mostly from departments in the Pentagon. Add this to the money from Homeland Security for local intelligence (aka spying) and money from the federal government for WarOnDrugs activities (not to mention the drugs themselves). The result is exactly what we have–militarized police departments overloaded with easily obtained military equipment and extra cash (which makes them independent of the communities they supposedly serve).

    I’m very interested in the Memphis, Michigan rationale for having tasers, and what the ratio between the number of tasers they acquired and the number of residents available to be tased.