occupysf_dwntwnsf.jpgA resolution expressing support for the “Occupy Wall Street” movement that also asks for force not to be used against the demonstrators in San Francisco was approved today by the city’s Board of Supervisors.

The resolution, introduced last week by Supervisor John Avalos and amended today by Supervisor Scott Wiener, asks Mayor Ed Lee and the Police Department to “ensure that there will be no unnecessary use of force to dislodge the Occupy SF demonstrators.”

The board voted 8-3 in favor of the resolution, a supermajority that could override a potential veto by Lee.

A spokeswoman from the mayor’s office today said the mayor “was not focused on the resolution.”

She said the mayor is working on finding “a solution where people can protest and the public plaza can be accessible to everyone–clean and safe.”

Avalos said it was important for the city to go on the record in support of the movement, which started in New York City in September and has spread nationwide.

The demonstrators cite the economic disparity between the richest 1 percent of the population and the other 99 percent, and are calling for increased regulation of banks and Wall Street investment firms, among other demands.

“I see the consciousness that’s changed across this country as a very good thing,” Avalos said.

He said police raids, such as the one last week at the encampment in Oakland, only serve to energize the protesters and lead to tensions about how the public spaces should be used.

Several supervisors criticized the actions of law enforcement officials during last Wednesday’s protest in Oakland, which included the use of tear gas and other projectiles, one of which seriously injured an Iraq war veteran, triggering even more protests and the reestablishment of the encampment there.

Among the amendments made to the resolution by Wiener today was the addition of the word “unnecessary.” That amendment was passed by a narrow 6-5 vote.

He said the extra word was necessary because “I don’t think it’s appropriate for us to tell the Police Department … no matter what happens, you cannot use force.”

Mark Farrell, one of the three supervisors to vote against the resolution along with Carmen Chu and Sean Elsbernd, said he supported the goals of the protests around the country but did not want to establish a precedent for future demonstrators.

“It’s a slippery slope to go down, what camping will we allow in our public spaces,” Farrell said. “That’s not a slippery slope I’m willing to go down.”

The approval of the measure was met with applause in the chamber from dozens of “Occupy SF” demonstrators who had attended the meeting.

Dan McMenamin, Bay City News

Want more news, sent to your inbox every day? Then how about subscribing to our email newsletter? Here’s why we think you should. Come on, give it a try.

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • Soonerdiver

    BS… the people are breaking the law and they should pay the consequences for their actions. What the spinelss “Supes” have done is say that it’s ok to break the law as long as we agree with you. The people of San Francisco have the most gutless Board of Superintendents in the whold damn state. You deserve everything you get out of this action.

  • Soonerdiver

    BS… the people are breaking the law and they should pay the consequences for their actions. What the spinelss “Supes” have done is say that it’s ok to break the law as long as we agree with you. The people of San Francisco have the most gutless Board of Superintendents in the whold damn state. You deserve everything you get out of this action.

  • Greg Dewar

    This is a completely meaningless action by the board, so whether you like the protesters or don’t like ’em, this resolution is utterly meaningless. Anyone who gets their knickers in a twist about it (be the previous commenter or an Occupy SF supporter) is getting upset over nothing.

    When St. Ed orders the cops in for the beatdown the day after the election, you’ll see just how much force these meaningless things have. But then again, that’s the trademark of progressive politicians in San Francisco – feel good resolutions that have no weight at all or meaning outside the moment they pass it.

  • Greg Dewar

    This is a completely meaningless action by the board, so whether you like the protesters or don’t like ’em, this resolution is utterly meaningless. Anyone who gets their knickers in a twist about it (be the previous commenter or an Occupy SF supporter) is getting upset over nothing.

    When St. Ed orders the cops in for the beatdown the day after the election, you’ll see just how much force these meaningless things have. But then again, that’s the trademark of progressive politicians in San Francisco – feel good resolutions that have no weight at all or meaning outside the moment they pass it.