tourk.lobbying.beth.jpgI’m always intrigued when I come upon dicey anonymous commentary on local politics.

Like the videos the SF Weekly’s ‘The Snitch’ and Fog City Journal have been posting, which feature a cartoon version of SF City Attorney and mayoral candidate Dennis Herrera and political consultant Alex Tourk (in shirtsleeves) discussing their recent lobbying drama.

The creators of these videos call themselves “Eye on SF.” As I can tell, their only shared content are two videos about the recent Tourk lobbying melee, which you can see on Eye on SF’s Tumblr, FCJ, and The Snitch.

My first reaction when watching those videos was, “Oh! I wonder if this could be coming from another campaign? Scandal!”

Loads of folks are covering the approaching Mayoral election, all of whom are hungry for content. And now we have a mysterious anonymous contributor providing that content! I love a nerdy mystery!

Now, I have no proof these videos are coming from anyone associated with a particular Mayoral campaign. It’s entirely possible “Eye on SF’ is an avid watcher of local politics and nothing more.

I’m just saying there are clues that the maker of this video is way too inside the nerdy process to be an uninvolved observer. And as I myself am way too inside this nerdy process too, I’m going to get a little Jessica Fletch on this “Eye on SF” and explore that possibility.

My first question is, why has “Eye on SF” only posted two videos about one subject? The videos have gone up anonymously on a Tumblr account and were sent to various media outlets (including this one) via an anonymous gmail account.

But there’s no other blog or video content from Eye on SF, suggesting to me that the Eye is on a very, very specific part of SF. I wanna see more dramatic reenactments! Do Joanna Rees shopping at Barney’s! Do Leland Yee asking a prostitute for directions! Do a Tony Hall and Wilma Pang duet!

Another thing I noticed was that in their second video, “they” make mention of an assistant (who happens to be my good friend.)

It was at this point in my viewing that I was like, ‘Wait a second.’ A reference to a consultant’s staffer doesn’t seem like the kind of thing someone getting their information solely from the extensive media coverage would have the knowledge about or feel the need to include. Right? Am I being paranoid? Probably.

Finally, anything anonymous is always intriguing to me because I have to wonder, why does ‘Eye on SF” refuse to reveal their identity?

And how do we feel about media outlets just republishing anonymous commentary of the Mayor’s race? We know political functionaries have tried to anonymously manipulate local online media before. Anyone could be making these videos, right?

What if it’s Gavin Newsom?!?

What the hell do I know? I recently pretended to vomit Mayoral Candidate headshots on my goofy webshow. I am not your best source on what is and what is not appropriate.

But I will be watching! And crossing my fingers that “Eye on SF”, whoever they are, provide us with a much needed Hall/Pang cover of “Don’t Go Breakin’ My Heart.”

Want more news, sent to your inbox every day? Then how about subscribing to our email newsletter? Here’s why we think you should. Come on, give it a try.

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • milkcluber

    Beth, here at CitiReport we don’t know the answer to your question, but we find the videos to be hilarious because they are dead-on about the wink-wink of SF City Hall under rules it makes up as it goes along. It wouldn’t be as funny if Herrera were not the City Attorney whose job is to enforce the rules. But, Beth, talk about your nerdy insider — Hall and Pang? Really? I remember Hall and Oates but I can’t place Hall and Pang.

  • milkcluber

    Beth, here at CitiReport we don’t know the answer to your question, but we find the videos to be hilarious because they are dead-on about the wink-wink of SF City Hall under rules it makes up as it goes along. It wouldn’t be as funny if Herrera were not the City Attorney whose job is to enforce the rules. But, Beth, talk about your nerdy insider — Hall and Pang? Really? I remember Hall and Oates but I can’t place Hall and Pang.

  • Beth S.

    Hi Milkcluber:

    I was talking about Mayoral candidates Tony Hall and Wilma Pang, both of whom are accomplimshed vocalists. I feel like a talent portion should be a component to any democratic process, and I’d love to see these two get together and rock the mike, ideally in real life but perhaps via Eye on SF.

    Have a great weekend,
    Beth

  • Beth S.

    Hi Milkcluber:

    I was talking about Mayoral candidates Tony Hall and Wilma Pang, both of whom are accomplimshed vocalists. I feel like a talent portion should be a component to any democratic process, and I’d love to see these two get together and rock the mike, ideally in real life but perhaps via Eye on SF.

    Have a great weekend,
    Beth

  • generic

    “Paranoia really is just a form of narcissism.”
    – M.G.

  • generic

    “Paranoia really is just a form of narcissism.”
    – M.G.