Judge Vaughn Walker, the federal judge who last week ruled to strike down Proposition 8, the California-voter mandated ban on same sex marriage, is repirtedly expected to rule by noon Thursday on whether same-sex marriages can resume, at least temporarily.

Shortly after Walker’s ruling last week, he put in place a “stay,” that is, a hold on the enforcement of his ruling allowing same sex marriages. That’s why folks like Vanessa Judicpa and Maria Ydil, who attempted to get married last week in City Hall, weren’t able to complete the ceremony and become legally wed.

SF City as well as State officials appear hopeful that Walker will allow marriages to resume — both Attorney General Jerry Brown and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger have encouraged him to lift the stay.

San Francisco’s City Hall is also prepared to start marrying couples, and SF’s Assessor-Recorder Phil Ting has said “We’re absolutely ready. We can’t wait for Judge Walker to lift his stay. We’re working with the County Clerk’s office. If they stay is lifted we are prepared to stay open until 8 tonight and stay open Saturday and Sunday from 9-to-5,”

As we discussed last week, no matter what Walker decides, the decision gets immediately appealed to the 9th Circuit court, which is expected to enforce it — that is, prevent any same-sex marriages from being performed until they rule on the Prop 8 supporters’ appeal of Walker’s decision on marriage equality, a case that won’t be heard until next year.

What all this means: if Walker does indeed decide that same sex marriages resume tomorrow, that window for marriage could only be open for a short period of time before it’s closed again by the 9th Circuit — but it’s clear that however long this window is, our city’s ready to marry, in the words of one source, “as many people as possible.”

Of course, we’ll be updating live, Stop8.org will be tweeting, and we’re always eager to receive your tips. See you tomorrow morning!

the author

Eve Batey is the editor and publisher of the San Francisco Appeal. She used to be the San Francisco Chronicle's Deputy Managing Editor for Online, and started at the Chronicle as their blogging and interactive editor. Before that, she was a co-founding writer and the lead editor of SFist. She's been in the city since 1997, presently living in the Outer Sunset with her husband, cat, and dog. You can reach Eve at eve@sfappeal.com.

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • brad

    As much as I would love to legally marry my husband for the fourth time (we registered as domestic partners and took part in the mass domestic partners ceremony at city hallm, then had a big wedding at my parents house 4 months later, then got an official San Francisco marriage license when Gavin opened the window, which was later nullified) I think it’s sad that I have to wait in a huge line to get another marriage attempt in through some very short open window, espcially when same sex couples in IOWA of all places (not to mention the other states that allow it) have all the freedom to go in and do it whenever they want. I really have mixed feelings about couple lining up for hours to squeeze in at one more little chance. Of course I am happy for them and I guess it’s a good demonstration of how important this right is to us. Is it wrong of me to say I look at that line of eager couples with mixed feelings?

  • brad

    As much as I would love to legally marry my husband for the fourth time (we registered as domestic partners and took part in the mass domestic partners ceremony at city hallm, then had a big wedding at my parents house 4 months later, then got an official San Francisco marriage license when Gavin opened the window, which was later nullified) I think it’s sad that I have to wait in a huge line to get another marriage attempt in through some very short open window, espcially when same sex couples in IOWA of all places (not to mention the other states that allow it) have all the freedom to go in and do it whenever they want. I really have mixed feelings about couple lining up for hours to squeeze in at one more little chance. Of course I am happy for them and I guess it’s a good demonstration of how important this right is to us. Is it wrong of me to say I look at that line of eager couples with mixed feelings?

  • brad

    Sorry, one more thing. Since we already have a marriage license from the City of San Francisco (and already paid the $165 or whatever it cost), why can’t we just take that license in and have it validated as legal?

  • brad

    Sorry, one more thing. Since we already have a marriage license from the City of San Francisco (and already paid the $165 or whatever it cost), why can’t we just take that license in and have it validated as legal?