sfpd_cityhall.jpgSan Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris announced today that noted trial lawyer John Keker will advise her office on the impact possible police misconduct cases may have on appeals of convictions.

The issue arose out of reports last week that dozens of San Francisco police officers may have criminal or disciplinary backgrounds that were not revealed to defense attorneys.

By law, prosecutors are required to disclose the criminal backgrounds of witnesses, including police officers or civilian department workers, to the defense. That information can be used to call into question the truthfulness of an officer’s testimony.

The district attorney’s office confirmed that it had received a letter in April from the Police Department that the backgrounds of more than 30 officers may have needed to be released.

Harris said today in a prepared statement that Keker, a private criminal defense attorney in San Francisco and former president of the San Francisco Police Commission, would help to assess “any potential impact future disclosures from the San Francisco Police Department about the misconduct and criminal history of San Francisco Police Department personnel may have on the cases which have already been adjudicated.”

Harris said Keker “has unimpeachable judgment and independence.”

In the same statement, Keker said Harris “has put the right system in place to deal with the forthcoming disclosures of police misconduct from the Police Department.”

Police Department spokeswoman Lt. Lyn Tomioka said today the total number of officers was not yet known.

Responding to a media report last week that the number may have grown to more than 80 officers, Public Defender Jeff Adachi said that hundreds of criminal convictions could potentially be overturned.

“With the information that we currently have, that’s not a verifiable number,” district attorney’s office spokeswoman Erica Derryck said today.

Derryck said her office was still waiting for the Police Department review of its officers to be completed.

“And until we have that, everybody is just speculating,” Derryck said.

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • bloomsm

    A lot of communication breakdowns present here. First, the DA gets a letter from SFPD advising that criminal backgrounds were not fully disclosed. Who was responsible for this error–SFPD, for not telling, or SF DA, for not asking? Next, we appoint John Keker to investigate. Keker is a great lawyer (ask Frank Quatrone); but appointing an outsider to figure out what happen smacks of trying to sweep this under the rug. Third, has anyone considered–between this and Madden–how many federal civil rights lawsuits are going to be filed against C&CSF due to wrongful conviction/civil rights violations?

  • SeanD

    Of course it’s being swept under the rug – at least until the November elections are over and Kamala and Gavin can get out of this podunk burg (though it would be nice to see this end their political careers – which it is not likely to because the public couldn’t care less about this sort of thing). Same goes for future litigation costs. And my understanding of Brady v Maryland is that it is 100% the prosecutor’s responsibility to investigate their witnesses and turn this info over to the defense.

  • bloomsm

    I would not be surprised to see Harris sell out the cops to cover herself. However, that won’t do much for her in a statewide AG race.

    And second what you’re saying about the public and their interest in this issue.