Trauma is alive and well in San Francisco: as the eponymous television show was brought back to life by its Burbank-based bankrollers; so too has the Trauma Recovery Center (as in the real-life rape, domestic violence and other real-life crisis center, which provides said real-life services free of charge) been resuscitated — at least until the the summertime. And at a much-lower rate!

Once scheduled to be closed March 1, the center will stay open at least bit longer, and at the bargain price of $425,000 (which would have bought you about two minutes’ worth of a Seinfeld episode). The Board of Supervisors’ Budget and Finance Committee restored that and another approximately $800,000 worth of services to the Department of Public Health on Wednesday.

Earlier this month, closing the Trauma Recovery Center, ending residential in-home substance abuse treatment services, and merging two psychiatric wards containing dangerous and not-so-dangerous patients at SF General Hospital were proposed in Mayor Gavin Newsom’s midyear cut plan, part of a city-wide effort to scrape together some $50 million in savings for this year’s budget deficit before the city has to scrape together some $500 million more in savings for next year’s budget deficit.

Now all that needs to happen is full Board approval next week — and approval from the Mayor, who gets to choose whether or not he’ll actually spend the money on those services.

“I’m hoping he will — I haven’t heard that he won’t,” Budget Chair Supervisor John Avalos said.

It’s to everyone’s benefit that he does, Avalos added — the city needs to agree on how to close its midyear gap sooner, rather than later: next month, bean-counters from Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s are coming to town to assess the city’s credit rating.

Why should you care? You’d care if you were about to sell over $1 billion in bonds on parks and hospitals, and about to ask the voters in June to approve almost $1 billion more. Those beancounters will watch, notice and judge, and if city leaders have a contentious time balancing the midyear budget, the city’s bond rating will suffer, Avalos said.

This “add-back” process is a familiar one to anyone attuned to the city’s seemingly-endless budget proceedings, and one that will play out numerous times before the 2010-2011 budget is finalized this summer.

Last year, progressive supervisors won about $44 million worth of add-backs to public services from the Mayor’s Office, and politically-savvy readers may be interested to know that the $450,000 worth of substance abuse treatment services scheduled to be cut were part of the add-backs.

This is exactly what Supervisor Chris Daly warned us about, too — that Newsom couldn’t be trusted to keep his word, and programs saved in July would just be killed in January.

Avalos thinks that it was all a mistake, and that the killed add-back — the only summertime add-back killed during this round of midyear cuts, he notes — is merely an “oversight.”

More budget fun to come next month, kids: the Mayor will announce more mid-year cuts, and if there’s pressure from those bond-rating analysts, watch out.

“There’s nothing but tough decisions ahead,” Avalos said. “I’m bracing myself.”

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!