Ammiano: Sacramento says you have the money; City Hall isn’t even sure how many votes it needs

Tomorrow’s Board of Supervisors debate over whether or not to spend about $8 million to save 100 jobs at the Department of Public Health (item 32 on your agenda) shouldn’t be a debate at all, according to the state legislator who helped assure that that money would be available — for the express purpose of preventing layoffs and saving jobs — in the first place.

“(State Assembly Bill 1383′s purpose) was to prevent layoffs and prevent cutbacks, and (that purpose) seems to be ignored as we speak,” said Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, who, while no stranger to the political circus that City Hall’s big dome can often resemble, expressed frustration with the “same old” games and “personality disputes” between Mayor Gavin Newsom and the Board over this particular pot of money. “There IS a solution — everyone just needs to be on the same page.”

There’s the rub.

Last week, an effort to give the Department of Public Health $8 million from the city’s general fund was scuttled when City Controller Ben Rosenfield said he would not certify the funds (meaning, he wouldn’t promise that the city did indeed have the cash in its wallet) if the Board voted it through. Tomorrow, the vote is on a second, separate measure to give $8 million from the DPH’s own general reserve fund — money guaranteed by Sacramento lawmakers, according to Ammiano — that will in turn save about 100 jobs: nurse’s assistants, clerks, mostly women and people of color, according to SEIU 1021, and no spokesmen or high wage-earners among them.

But there’s now division simply over how many votes the measure needs to pass (whether or not it SHOULD is, of course, a separate affair). The City Attorney’s Office said Friday it needs a 2/3s majority in order to pass, and affirmed that position Monday; Supervisor Chris Daly, author of the measure, said in a letter dated Monday and addressed to Board President David Chiu that it needs only a simple majority.

The Appeal was unable to reach Chiu for comment but will keep trying. His opinion could be the deal-maker or breaker: the budget measure is expected to have at least three and probably four nay votes in chamber tomorrow.

So how does all this play out upstairs with Ammiano, whose efforts to help his constituents and local political colleagues may now be moot?

“There’s a disconnect on priorities,” said Quintin Mecke, Ammiano’s spokesman.

“Everyone knows what the realities are… it make sense to postpone the cuts as long as possible, even if it’s for six months to a year… layoffs of front-line (i.e. lowest-paid) workers, predominately women and people of color, makes no sense.”

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • SweetMelissa

    I was told that 8 votes are necessary to pass Daly’s proposal because the budget that was passed contained the cuts that are about affect SEIU employees. Un-doing cuts that have already passed needs a 2/3 majority.

    At any rate, since the Mayor would probably veto it, 8 votes would may be needed anyway.

  • SweetMelissa

    I was told that 8 votes are necessary to pass Daly’s proposal because the budget that was passed contained the cuts that are about affect SEIU employees. Un-doing cuts that have already passed needs a 2/3 majority.

    At any rate, since the Mayor would probably veto it, 8 votes would may be needed anyway.

  • Chris Roberts

    The City Attorney would agree with you, Melissa, but Chris Daly would not. Peep the letter, linked in the story, for his take on it.

    And yes, eight are needed to override a veto, but this begs the question — if Sacramento votes DPH money to save jobs, and it’s DPH’s money, not anyone else’s, why would Mistermayor then override Sacramento’s doing? Not saying he will or he won’t — I have no idea, as usual — just putting it out there.

  • Chris Roberts

    The City Attorney would agree with you, Melissa, but Chris Daly would not. Peep the letter, linked in the story, for his take on it.

    And yes, eight are needed to override a veto, but this begs the question — if Sacramento votes DPH money to save jobs, and it’s DPH’s money, not anyone else’s, why would Mistermayor then override Sacramento’s doing? Not saying he will or he won’t — I have no idea, as usual — just putting it out there.

  • SweetMelissa

    Oh, I saw the letter. And talked with Daly, but David Chiu agreed with the City Atty at today’s meeting. Luckily for Chiu, the vote on the $7.5 million was postponed because they got 8 votes to pass about $2 million to get through the holidays – making it a moot point for now.

    Problem is, even the most optimistic estimate (from the SEIU) is that the money will come in April. And it’s not clear to me whether that money goes straight to DPH or to the general fund. At any rate, by that time, we’ll be well into dealing with next year’s budget – and Mistermayor is likely to use it to pay for stuff in FY 2010-2011 – DPH stuff, perhaps, but not to save the jobs at issue now.

  • SweetMelissa

    Oh, I saw the letter. And talked with Daly, but David Chiu agreed with the City Atty at today’s meeting. Luckily for Chiu, the vote on the $7.5 million was postponed because they got 8 votes to pass about $2 million to get through the holidays – making it a moot point for now.

    Problem is, even the most optimistic estimate (from the SEIU) is that the money will come in April. And it’s not clear to me whether that money goes straight to DPH or to the general fund. At any rate, by that time, we’ll be well into dealing with next year’s budget – and Mistermayor is likely to use it to pay for stuff in FY 2010-2011 – DPH stuff, perhaps, but not to save the jobs at issue now.