BikeLane.jpgAre bikes allowed the full use of the lane on every street, or only streets with no bike lane? That is, when there’s a bike lane, are bikes required to ride in it, or can they opt to ride in the wider lane where there’s a diminished risk of crashing into opening car doors?

After speaking with Ryan Dodge of the SFMTA’s Bicycle Program, I’ve arrived at this conclusion: if there’s a bike lane, bicyclists “should” ride in it unless certain circumstances (see below) arise — but, unless you’re causing a potential hazard to yourself or others (i.e., riding super slowly and/or blocking traffic), you probably will not get cited for biking on the main road.

Not enough for you? Here’s what the DMV says (see V.C. section 21202):

Any person operating a bicycle upon a roadway at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at that time shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway except under any of the following situations:

(1) When overtaking and passing another bicycle or vehicle proceeding in the same direction.

(2) When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway.

(3) When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions (including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards, or substandard width lanes) that make it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or edge, subject to the provisions of Section 21656. For purposes of this section, a “substandard width lane” is a lane that is too narrow for a bicycle and a vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane.

(4) When approaching a place where a right turn is authorized.

(b) Any person operating a bicycle upon a roadway of a highway, which highway carries traffic in one direction only and has two or more marked traffic lanes, may ride as near the left-hand curb or edge of that roadway as practicable.

Think of “Ask the Appeal” as your own personal genie: no Bay-related question is too big or too small. Whether you’re concerned with a municipal question, a consumer advocacy issue or simply with consuming alcohol, email us your questions at ask@sfappeal.com. We’ll either do the dirty work and talk to the folks in charge, contact an expert in the field, or – if your question is particularly intriguing or juicy – develop it into a full-blown investigative article.

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • cv

    No surprise here.

    Basically, you aren’t allow to impede the normal flow of traffic because it’s dangerous. And creating dangerous situations on the road (for yourself or others) is illegal. Just do what’s the safest. Pretty much common sense, but from my observations, common sense is sadly absent in some people.

  • cv

    No surprise here.

    Basically, you aren’t allow to impede the normal flow of traffic because it’s dangerous. And creating dangerous situations on the road (for yourself or others) is illegal. Just do what’s the safest. Pretty much common sense, but from my observations, common sense is sadly absent in some people.

  • raqcoon

    Two of those signs (“bicyclists allowed full use of lane”) are posted on Cesar Chavez eastbound between 101 and Evans. Both lanes are usually occupied by fast-moving semi’s, mack trucks and the usual speedy SUVs and other motorized apparatus. Take a lane when I’m on bicycle? I don’t think so. And there are many other signs posted on equally treacherous SF roadways. I think these signs are designed to help next-of-bicyclist’s-kin claim right-of-way posthumously.

  • raqcoon

    Two of those signs (“bicyclists allowed full use of lane”) are posted on Cesar Chavez eastbound between 101 and Evans. Both lanes are usually occupied by fast-moving semi’s, mack trucks and the usual speedy SUVs and other motorized apparatus. Take a lane when I’m on bicycle? I don’t think so. And there are many other signs posted on equally treacherous SF roadways. I think these signs are designed to help next-of-bicyclist’s-kin claim right-of-way posthumously.