BART management and union leaders, who have been negotiating without success since April 1, resumed their war of words today after members of the transit agency’s second-largest union voted unanimously against management’s contract offer.

Jesse Hunt, the president of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1555, which represents about 900 train operators, station agents and power workers, said about three-quarters of his members voted on the offer Tuesday and all of those who voted cast “no” votes.

Members of BART’s largest union, the BART chapter of Local 1021 of the Service Employees International Union, which represents about 1,400 mechanics, custodians, safety inspectors and clerical employees, will vote on the contract proposal on Thursday.
Local 1021 spokesman Carlos Rivera said the results will be available sometime after 8 p.m. Thursday. Rivera declined to predict the outcome of the vote, saying the union’s leaders “want to let the membership decide.”

Hunt said his members are upset that management didn’t give serious consideration to a proposal by BART’s unions that he said would achieve $760 million in long-term savings.
Hunt said the union proposal would save $700 million over 25 years by extending from five years to 15 years the time period before employees would be eligible for retirement health benefits.

He said the proposal would save another $60 million over the next two years.

Hunt accused BART management of having “a take-it-or-leave-it attitude” and alleged that once management made its offer last Thursday night it refused to properly consider the unions’ proposal.

But BART spokesman Linton Johnson said the unions’ offer fails to address the immediate fiscal crisis the transit agency faces, as it’s trying to save $100 million in labor costs as part of its effort to deal with its large budget deficit, which is expected to be $310 million over the next four years.

Johnson also said changing the eligibility period for retirement health benefits isn’t possible under the rules of the state’s retirement plan, alleging that the unions are proposing to switch to a plan the state doesn’t even offer.

Johnson said an actuarial analysis that will be discussed at a special BART board meeting on Thursday finds that the unions’ projections are hundreds of millions of dollars short of the purported $760 million in savings.

He said the analysis shows that the unions’ proposal “at best saves us a little money and at worst costs us money.”

Jean Hamilton, the president of BART’s third-largest union, Local 3993 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which represents about 200 middle managers, said she still hasn’t scheduled a vote for her members because she said she needs to get more information from management.

Members of ATU Local 1555, SEIU Local 1021 and AFSCME Local 3993 all voted overwhelmingly last month to approve a strike if a settlement isn’t reached on a new contract.

There also are two small unions that represent BART police officers and managers. However, they’re barred from going on strike.

Johnson said the police unions haven’t yet scheduled a vote on management’s proposal because they’re still meeting with management.

Johnson alleged that the leaders of SEIU Local 1021 and ATU Local 1555 “in effect staged a publicity stunt” shortly after 11 p.m. last Thursday night when they told a large group of reporters who gathered outside the negotiating site and said they were unhappy with management’s offer but would take it to their members for a vote.

The announcement was made shortly before the contract for union members expired at midnight Thursday.

Johnson said when the union leaders made their announcement management was still in the process of fleshing out its proposal to AFSCME Local 3993 and the police unions.
Although the unions theoretically could go on strike at any time, Hunt said his union doesn’t have any strike plans at this time and other union leaders also said they don’t have any immediate strike plans.

However, Hunt said all options, including a strike, are on the table if management doesn’t negotiate in good faith.

The unions previously said that they might ask Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to declare a 60-day cooling-off period in negotiations but Schwarzenegger announced on Tuesday that he won’t take that step if he’s asked to do so.

BART directors sent the governor a letter last month asking him not to declare a cooling-off period.

Johnson said the most likely next step in the process is that contract talks, with the help of state mediators, will resume Monday afternoon.

Johnson said that in the unlikely event that SEIU Local 1021 members approve the contract, BART’s board would approve and implement the contract with that union and continue negotiating with the other unions.

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!
  • Greg Dewar

    This militant tough guy talk is bullsh*t and needs to stop now for there to be a sensible solution. I for one am tired of the posturing by both sides, and it’s clear that neither side is willing to look at the big picture issues that should be uniting them.

    What is that, you ask? Well it’s the fact that most of BART’s deficit comes from parasitical health care costs. You’d think management and labor would unit, get pitchforks and torches, and burn the health care industry to the ground for charging high prices and providing such crappy service.

    Why should employers be in charge of administering health care plans anyway? That’s a hold over from World War II when employers wanted to bust wage controls instituted for the duration of the conflict. It’s stupid, it’s inefficient, and is killing companies and public agencies.

    But instead both sides continue the macho posturing. We all lose in the end.